In our final blog post for 2015, we’re taking a look at the last of the most common conflict-of-interest questions OSBA receives on its hotline: board members who hold more than one public office. Previous weeks have covered scenarios where:
This month, we’ve been looking at the most common questions OSBA attorneys receive regarding board member conflicts-of-interest. Those include:
Through the month of December, we’re looking at the most common scenarios in which an incoming board member may have a conflict of interest. Last week, we discussed individuals currently working and volunteering for the district (you can read that blog entry here). This week, we’ll take a look at board members that have family members working for the school district. In the coming weeks, we’ll look at board members that are employed by or own a company that has an active cont
Hundreds of new individuals will begin serving on school boards in Ohio next month. The legal hotline has received several questions about conflicts of interest for incoming members. (Remember: OSBA attorneys cannot provide a legal analysis of the specifics for a board member, but we can provide legal information to help you determine whether you should speak with board counsel about a potential conflict.)
While it can arise in many contexts, we most commonly receive the question as one of four basic scenarios:
All elected officials or their appropriate designees are required to attend public records training approved by the attorney general (RC 149.43(E)). The training must be for three hours for each term of office for which the elected official was appointed or elected to the public office (RC 109.43(B)).
‘Tis the season for board transition! But what happens if your board returns from the holidays in January at less than full capacity? A vacancy may occur on the board for many reasons, but vacancies typically occur in January as a result of one of two things. Either a board member has resigned from the board during the middle of his/her term with an effective date of December 31 or the board had more open seats than interested candidates at the most recent election. In either case, a vacancy will occur on the board as of January 1 and the vacancy should be filled usi
On June 30, 2013, House Bill (HB) 59, also known as the budget bill, was signed by Governor Kasich. Effective September 29, 2013, the bill added a new topic to the topics that may be discussed during an executive session of a public body.
Under current law, RC 121.22 (G) provides seven topics, six of which are applicable to school boards, which allow public bodies to remove themselves from public view to engage in discussion regarding certain matters.
No. In advisory opinion 2011-038 (2011 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 038), the Ohio Attorney General (OAG) concluded that a public body (in this instance the State Board of Education) may not vote in an open meeting by secret ballot. The OAG determined that voting by secret ballot would violate Ohio's open meetings law in much the same way as a violation occurs when public officials whisper or pass documents among themselves during meetings or when a vote would improperly be taken during executive session.
Yes. On April 22, 2010, the Ohio Ethics Commission (OEC) issued Advisory Opinion No. 2010-01 regarding the application of the Ethics Law to community school officials. All governing boards of community schools are required to sign contracts agreeing to be bound by RC Chapter 102 and Section 2921.42.
In the case of Lowery v. Jefferson County Bd. of Educ., a high school football coach from Jefferson County High School in Tennessee dismissed three students from the football team for challenging his leadership. After the students parents were unsuccessful with their complaints to school officials, they addressed their concerns to the Jefferson County Board of Education.
